Intergenerational Communication in Traditional and Virtual Bulgarian Families

Abstract Mobility and migration processes through transnational borders outline the new dimensions of the modern world. The countless possibilities to work and study abroad are among the main reasons for the younger generations in Bulgaria to leave their country and their family, relatives and friends. The newly formed virtual family form composed of a married or unmarried couple, a family with children (narrowly) and their ancestors (broadly) where single, several or all members of the family unit do not live in the same household faces immense challenges. Despite the contemporary seamless and timely communication possibilities, the paper seeks to answer two research questions: Does the intergenerational divide deepen in the virtual family over time? How the communication is changing in the virtual family compared with the traditional one? Thus the aim of the study is to measure the generational divide in the communications between virtual and traditional families. A comparative analysis of in-depth face-to-face and Skype interviews with respondents from virtual and traditional families has been conducted. The results and conclusions indicate that the different daily routine and lifestyle of the family members could alienate them. Intergenerational divide between younger and older members is detected both in virtual and traditional family. This reduces the effectiveness of the interactive communication between the family members, especially with regard to older people when they live apart.Keywords Virtual family Traditional family Intergenerational divide Ageing This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Notes Acknowledgements The paper has been developed within the framework of COST Action CA16226 Indoor Living Space Improvement: Smart Habitat for the Elderly (SHELD-ON) of the European Commission, supported by the research projects КP-06-COST/5-18/06/2019 and КP-06-M35/4-18/12/2019 of the National Scientific Fund of Bulgaria and the Program Young Scientists and Post Docs of the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science.References

1. 1. Raycheva, L., Velinova, N.: Reappraising the intellectual debate on ageing in a digital environment. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11592, pp. 300–312. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. 2. United Nations: The United Nations Principles for Older Persons (1991). http://www.olderpeoplewales.com/en/about/un-principles.aspx

3. 3. United Nations: Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (2014). http://www.unescap.org/resources/madrid-international-plan-action-ageing

4. 4. Sánchez, L., Goldani, A.: The changing shape of ties in European families: profiles and intentions of LAT couples. Presented at Population and Association of America 2012, in Session 56: Non-marital and Diverse Family Forms (2012)Google Scholar

5. 5. Tomov, M.: Human-computer interaction (HCI) between “virtual family” members: a Bulgarian case. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11579, pp. 54–67. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21905-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. 6. McLuhan, M.: The Gutenberg Galaxy. University of Toronto Press, Toronto (1962)Google Scholar

7. 7. Castells, M.: The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn. Oxford Blackwell, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar

8. 8. Loos, E., de la Hera, T., Simons, M., Gevers, D.: Setting up and conducting the co-design of an intergenerational digital game: a state-of-the-art literature review. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11592, pp. 56–69. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. 9. Fortunati, L.: Is body to body communication still the prototype? Inf. Soc. 21(1), 53–61 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. 10. Duncombe, J., Marsden, D.: Love and intimacy: the gender division of emotion and ‘emotion work’: a neglected aspect of sociological discussion of heterosexual relationships. Sociology 27(2), 221–241 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038593027002003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. 11. Bulgarian Sociologist Association: Code of Ethics (2004). http://bsa-bg.eu/bsa1/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/ethical_code.pdf

12. 12. Miller, D., Madianou, M.: Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. Routledge, New York (2011)Google Scholar

13. 13. Stoyanova, D.: Conceptual and technological approaches to parental education in the context of positive-oriented family upbringing. Sci. Pap. Univ. Ruse 51(6.2), 129–133 (2012)Google Scholar

14. 14. National Social Security Institute: Pensions statistical bulletin as of 30 June 2019 (2019). https://www.nssi.bg/images/bg/about/statisticsandanalysis/statistics/pensii/STATB22019.pdf

Copyright information © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

About this paper

CrossMark Cite this paper as:Raycheva L., Tomov M., Velinova N. (2020) Intergenerational Communication in Traditional and Virtual Bulgarian Families. In: Gao Q., Zhou J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technology and Society. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12209. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_20

• First Online10 July 2020

• DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_20

• Publisher NameSpringer, Cham

• Print ISBN978-3-030-50231-7

• Online ISBN978-3-030-50232-4

• eBook PackagesComputer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

• Buy this book on publisher's site

• Reprints and Permissions